The accused shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. 공소사실 피고인은 2014. 2. 12.부터 2014. 3. 5.까지 부산 동래구 C 지하1층 소재 D에서 그곳을 찾은 손님들에게 게임물인 ‘바다사랑’을 그 등급분류 받은 내용(전체이용가로서 연시, 연타 기능이 없고, 이용자의 실력에 따라 점수를 취득하는 순수능력 게임임)과 다르게 ‘자동진행장치(일명 : 똑딱이)를 이용하여 우연적인 방법으로 결과가 결정되게 하고, 외부저장장치를 통해 게임내용을 변경할 수 있도록 하는’ 내용으로 이를 이용에 제공하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant provided game products that are different from the above classification for use.

2. Determination

A. The subject of rating under the Game Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter “Game Industry Promotion Act”) is the contents of the game product or program itself, which is not the game product or program license itself, and the contents of the game contents description attached thereto.

Therefore, the act of providing game products with contents different from the rating obtained” under Article 32(1)2 of the Game Industry Act includes not only the act of changing the contents of the application or the explanation attached thereto, but also the act of adding the important functions not indicated in the above application or explanation, but also the act of providing separate external organs, which is not likely to cause any change to the contents of the game products.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2014Do12, Jun. 2, 2014). (b)

According to the records, ① The game description attached to the application for classification of each game product installed in the game site of this case is the game product of this case with the same content as that stated in the facts charged of this case, and accordingly, the game product of this case is the case where free gifts are generated upon completion of the operation.