1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the decision;

A. The Plaintiff, who served as an associate professor at C University established and operated by the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”), was reappointed for the term of appointment from March 1, 2009 to February 28, 2015.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for deliberation on the reappointment with the president of a school of Nonparty, prior to the expiration of the term of appointment. However, on November 25, 2014, the Plaintiff was notified that the Plaintiff submitted additional explanatory materials by December 10, 2014 on the ground that the Plaintiff falls short of the requirements for reappointment.

Results of the first deliberation on requirements for reappointment: ① Recognition of only 190% out of research performance records of at least 200% in the last three years - Non-recognition of points D (2 reform, issuance on September 3, 2012) - Recognition of points not to be granted 20% out of the research performance records of at least 200% in the last three years - Recognition of only 21% out of 50% of the research field (education, research, and service field) for six years.

C. Accordingly, on December 9, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted D(Offset 1), etc. as explanatory materials, and was deemed to meet the requirements for reappointment. However, the said requirements were deemed to have satisfied the requirements for reappointment, but the Plaintiff was notified by the Intervenor on December 26, 2014 on the grounds that the requirements for reappointment still fall short of the criteria for reappointment.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of Refusal to Re-election". The grounds for refusal to re-elections stated in the above notice are as follows:

Table 1

1. Related to: Article 24 (Requirements for Re-Appointment) of the Regulations on Appointment of Teachers under Article 24 (Requirements for Re-Appointment) (1) of the Regulations on Appointment of Teachers shall be based on the evaluation of achievements in accordance with the Regulations on the

Provided, That the initial appointment of new teachers shall be made according to the terms and conditions of the contract.

(2) The minimum standard points of each class and each area necessary for the reappointment of teachers, the employment period of which has elapsed, shall be as follows:

The class evaluation period (before the date of proposal) shall be 600% 600% 600% 50% 800% 600% 50% 50% 50% of associate professors 6 years 900% 50% 1,200% of 50% of associate professors 90% 90% 1,200

2. Contents: