logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.02.13 2013고합366
살인등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

Seized evidence shall be confiscated by the accused respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

및 부착명령청구 원인사실 피고인 겸 피부착명령청구인(이하 ‘피고인’이라 한다)은 2013. 5. 21. 12:10경부터 2013. 5. 22. 21:25경까지 사이에 서울 강서구 C 101호에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 과거 ‘알코올 사용의 의존 증후군’으로 정신병원에 입원하여 치료를 받을 당시 같은 병원에 같은 병명으로 입원 치료를 받고 있어 알게 된 피해자 D(39세)을 집으로 초청하여 함께 술을 마시던 중, 알 수 없는 이유로 피해자의 목을 목뿔뼈가 골절될 정도로 강하게 누르고, 집안에 있던 쇠망치 등을 이용하여 피해자의 가슴 부위를 양쪽 갈비뼈 14개가 골절될 정도로 강하게 때려 피해자를 그 자리에서 둔력에 의한 가슴부위 손상으로 사망하게 하여 살해하였다.

As above, the Defendant is a person who has committed murder and is likely to recommit the murder crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. On-site identification report (on-site map, on-site photo), investigation report (including each accompanying material, suspect's criminal administration related to attachment, attachment of Chinese restaurant account books, attachment of photographs, attachment of cell phone images, attachment of H convenience CCTV photographs, relation to telephone conversations analysis, telephone contents analysis, possibility of assaulting the victim by a third person at the time of committing the crime, and report on the results of digital siren analysis);

1. Each seizure record of the police;

1. The body autopsy report, autopsy report, each general medical certificate (A, D), each request for appraisal, medical vehicle analysis report, and each fact-finding report;

1. Photographs of the details of mobile phone calls, replys to communications data, and data and replys;

1. The risk of repeating a crime as indicated in the judgment: The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above and the statement of the social report before the claim, i.e., the defendant murdered the victim by using violent methods such as the statement in the judgment, and ii) the defendant's risk of recidivism in Korea.

arrow