A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

With respect to the person against whom the attachment order is requested, the location tracking electronic device shall be installed for ten years.

Criminal facts

The facts leading up to the cause of the attachment order [the facts of the crime] Defendant and the person subject to a request for the attachment order (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) have weak capacity to discern things or make decisions due to the personality and behavior disorder caused by brain damage, etc., and, at around 11:20, around January 10, 2013, the Plaintiff died of the victim D (the elderly, the elderly, and the aged 80 years old) by putting the victim D (the elderly, the aged 80 years old) over the floor to the bottom of the city bus stops near the entrance of the urban bus stops at around the entrance of the apartment complex at the time of leisure times, due to unknown reasons. On the other hand, the Defendant and the person subject to a request for the attachment order (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) sustained the victim’s body several times by taking a width support unit (the length, 140cm, 6cm, weight 1.9kg) continuously and balking the victim’s body by taking approximately three hairs, hairing, and cutting the body.

[Fact that constitutes a cause for an attachment order] The Defendant is a person who commits murder as above and is likely to recommit such a crime.

Summary of Evidence

Witness

The risk of repeating a crime in the judgment of the E, F, and G’s respective legal statements H, and I’s written examination of the police’s written examination of the prosecutor’s statement, the CCTV screen pictures and photographs related to the suspect, CD CDs, each photo site summary map, and satellite photographs as a result of the examination of the mental examination report: The following circumstances are acknowledged based on the above evidence and the social and criminal records: ① as a result of the application of the E, F, and G’s written examination of recidivism risk assessment (KOTRAS-G) to the Defendant, the Defendant’s total point of 18 points is deemed to have high risk of repeating a crime; ② as a result of the evaluation of the adult recidivism risk assessment tool (PCL-R), the determination based on the evaluation standard of recidivism risk falls under “high level”; ② the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for a criminal offense, such as assault, injury, etc., and was sentenced several times, but the head of the victim was led to the death of the victim; ③ The Defendant took the victim of a traffic accident in around 197.