The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The Defendant’s motion to attach an attachment order is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court found the Defendant and the requester for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) guilty of murder even though there is no direct evidence to acknowledge the facts charged of the instant case, and indirect evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is difficult to deem that the facts charged were proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to the probative value of evidence or misapprehending the legal doctrine.

The sentence of the lower court (15 years of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The lower judgment ordering the Defendant to attach an electronic tracking device, inasmuch as the Defendant did not commit murder and the Defendant did not pose a risk of recommitting murder, is unreasonable.

2. Determination of the accused case

가. 공소사실 및 원심의 판단 이 사건 공소사실은, 피고인은 2013. 5. 21. 12:10경부터 2013. 5. 22. 21:25경까지 사이에 서울 강서구 C 101호 피고인의 집에서, 과거 알코올 사용의 의존 증후군으로 정신병원에 입원하여 치료를 받을 당시 같은 병원에 같은 병명으로 입원 치료를 받고 있어 알게 된 피해자 D(39세)을 집으로 초대하여 함께 술을 마시던 중, 알 수 없는 이유로 피해자의 목을 목뿔뼈가 골절될 정도로 강하게 누르고, 집안에 있던 쇠망치 등을 이용하여 피해자의 가슴 부위를 양쪽 갈비뼈 14개가 골절될 정도로 강하게 때려 피해자를 그 자리에서 둔력에 의한 가슴부위 손상으로 사망하게 하여 살해하였다는 것이다.

In full view of the evidence in the judgment below, the court below found the defendant guilty on the ground that the above facts charged can be recognized.

B. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the victim died in the course of the Defendant’s home from around 12:10 on May 21, 2013 to around 21:25 on the following day, and the Defendant and the victim were inside the house.