logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고정286
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 18:00 on May 15, 2014, at the D Private Teaching Institutes room located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, only two months have passed since the victim E entered the F Middle Schools, and there was no record of causing violence at F Middle Schools, and the Defendant’s “E confirms the thickness of the F Middle School principal, the vice-principal, the vice-principal, and the vice-principal,” and thus, the Defendant, despite the absence of a record of causing violence at F Middle Schools G, H president, I planning office, Korean language teacher J, English teacher K, L, etc., were heard by the above persons.

As you do, I will know about the students of the school principal, the students of the assistant principal, and the students of the assistant principal, and you will know about the students of the school.

ASEAN is a malicious baby.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of a witness I;

1. Application of the statutes in which the statement of witness M is entered in the third public trial protocol;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a sentence, the selection of a fine (six persons, including G, H, I, the head of planning office, Korean language teacher J, English teacherK, L, etc., the head of the pertinent private teaching institute, who was at the time of the defendant's oral statement as stated in the facts constituting the crime, are the persons related to the private teaching institute accompanying the victim, and there is no special relationship with the victim if excluding the teachers in charge, and there is no disciplinary right against the victim, nor take any exclusive responsibility for the victim, and therefore, they are in a special position not likely to spread

It is difficult to see that the public performance of the Defendant’s remarks is recognized.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow