1. Of the instant lawsuit, the Superintendent of the Daejeon Metropolitan City Office of Education, on November 1, 2016, revokes appointment against the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On December 9, 2015, the Plaintiff, a school foundation operating GJ high schools, was newly employed as a teacher on March 1, 2016 through a new teacher recruitment announcement.

The principal C of the G High School took charge of all duties as the principal of the screening committee at the time of employing the above new teacher, and the principal H, principal D of the G High School, assistant principal D of the G High School, F, G High School Teachers E, G High School Teachers E, the head of the administrative office of the G High School, and the administrative department Grade 6 of the G High School as a member of the screening committee (hereinafter referred to as the “peach member in general if referred to as the “peach member”).

On June 2, 2016, the defendant's Superintendent of the Office of Education, unlike the notice of examination, added up only two grades of the subject of education in the first examination to the subject of education and the subject of education, did not apply to the subject of occupational ability evaluation. In the case of the major of education, the first applicant among the subjects of education was selected, and the first applicant was selected by B, etc. after being exposed to personal information in the subject of occupational ability evaluation, and requested C and E to take a minor disciplinary action against C and E, H, D, F, I, and J, and the cancellation of appointment for B.

On June 27, 2016, June 30, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for reexamination on the request of the Defendant’s superintendent of education. However, the Defendant’s superintendent of education dismissed the said application for reexamination on July 21, 2016.

On August 10, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) held a board of directors on August 10, 2016 to reject the proposal for revocation of appointment for B; (b) held a disciplinary committee on September 8, 2016 to decide on each reprimand, D, F, E, I, and J; and (c) notified the Defendant’s superintendent of education on September 12, 2016.

On September 28, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff would take additional measures when the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee was not implemented, on the grounds that there was a defect in the composition of the Plaintiff Disciplinary Committee.

2.3.