logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.01.29 2015구합1687
파면처분취소
Text

1. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant’s decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request for revocation of removal from office is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. A. Around April 1983, the Plaintiff was newly appointed as Cmiddle School Teachers. Around March 1991, the Plaintiff was transferred to D Middle School Teachers (Emiddle School, 201, hereinafter “E Middle School”) and served as a teacher, and was promoted to E Middle School Deputy Principals around 2008. Around August 201, 201, the Plaintiff was transferred to an assistant principal of F High School.

B. Around 2013, the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education conducted a special audit of E Middle Schools, and found the following matters, and requested the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) to give warning to the participants involved on May 21, 2013, and filed an accusation with the investigation agency.

At the time of selecting new students in 2009, three successful applicants for international screening and two persons subject to social care have renounced registration and five vacancies have occurred, three general screenings (in violation of the quota for each first approved screening) and one international screening (in violation of the quota for each type of screening) were selected.

When new students were selected in 2010, three general screening applicants renounced their registration and three vacancies occur, the additional successful candidates were selected at the meeting of the Admission Management Committee without any separate selection procedure.

The E-middle School G, the former principal H, the former principal, and the assistant principal I who unfairly selected the applicants for the additional new students even in 2009 and 2010, give a warning to the subject of the statute of limitations for disciplinary action. At the time, the KJ of the teachers in charge of the practice of admission at that time gives a warning to the future.

G (L) the Head of the school (L) before the warning person, H (L) of the former principal, the plaintiff, the assistant principal, I, and teachers J

C. On July 16, 2013, the Plaintiff was indicted by Seoul Northern District Court 2013Gohap198 due to the following criminal facts. On November 15, 2013, the court of first instance sentenced the Plaintiff to a fine of KRW 10 million.

K shall be the Chairman B, L Elementary School, E Middle School, and .

arrow