logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.04.15 2015고정697
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and two years and six months for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act, etc. at the Suwon District Court on August 13, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 10, 2015.

On July 11, 2013, the Defendant, in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, stated “D”, “E”, “E”, and “D” in the address column in the customer name column of D’s mobile phone entry application form, and used forged private documents by means of forging an application form under the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of signing and exercising a signature on the applicant column after entering “D” in the “E”, “E”, and “E” in the address column, and using a forged private document in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Previous records: Application of the defendant's legal statement and copy of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The criminal facts before and after the judgment of the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the crimes committed by forging and using nine mobile phone application form from June 2013 to August 2013. The principle of equity was taken into account when the crime is adjudicated concurrently with the crime.

arrow