beta
Text
Defendant
A In the case of paragraphs (a) and (b) of Section 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the crimes listed in [Attachment 1] 1 to 10 per annum.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On March 20, 2014, A was sentenced to one year after suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on June, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 28, 2014.
1. Defendant A
A. On May 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 in mid-term 17:00, on the H points in the management of the Victim F in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, without any special import; and (b) on the said main points, the Defendant, despite having been provided alcoholic beverages at the said main points, takes a bath after drinking, without any justifiable reason, by placing an order, even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price; and (c) doing so with the customers who are seated on other tables, making them up for a large amount of interest while running a trial, etc.; and (d) did not pay KRW 5,000 for the said amount.
Accordingly, the defendant did not interfere with the victim's main business and did not pay the price even after receiving the property from the victim, thereby acquiring the property profit equivalent to the same amount.
B. On October 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:00 on the first day of the Defendant committed the crime against the victim I, and (b) on the said main points, provided the said main points with no specific import in the K point in the Daegu-gu J, Seo-gu, and without any justifiable reason, provided the said I with an intent or ability to pay the price, and (c) without any justifiable reason, provided the said I with an intent to “I”, and (d) provided the said I with an intention to pay for the said price, and (e) prevented the Defendant from leaving or entering the said place for about two hours by using a large fluence with the customers who are seated on other tables; and (e) did not pay KRW 3,000 as the price.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business, and did not pay 3,000 won of the price by deceiving the victim to receive property, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount, and from around that time to July 15, 2014, the defendant's list of crimes.