logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.09 2016고정3440
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the head of the partnership for the redevelopment and improvement project of D houses from September 26, 2006 to Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Where a person who owns members, land, etc. requests perusal or reproduction of documents and related materials concerning the implementation of a rearrangement project under the Urban and Residential Environment Rearrangement Act, the project implementer, the head of an association, etc. shall comply with such request within 15 days.

A. On April 29, 2016, the Defendant received a certificate of demand for disclosure of information on the list of owners of land, etc. and the list of members of the association for D Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from F, the landowner of the said project, at the office of association for D Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project.

However, the Defendant refused to disclose information, such as the list of owners of the above land and the list of members of the association, on the ground that it is difficult to understand the purpose of using the list.

B. On May 17, 2016, the Defendant received a certificate of content demanding the disclosure of information from F on the list of owners, such as land, from F at the above partnership office.

However, on the ground that the owners of the above land, etc. did not appoint a defense counsel, the Defendant disclosed only 13 cash liquidation list among the owners of the above land, etc. and rejected the disclosure of information on the remaining list.

2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone that the Defendant unfairly rejected the F’s request for disclosure of data as stated in the facts charged.

There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. On April 29, 2016, G, a law firm G, delegated by F, submitted to the Defendant, the president of the partnership, a written request for disclosure of information on the list of owners of the land, etc. and the list of members of the redevelopment and consolidation partnership of this case (hereinafter “instant partnership”) by mail.

arrow