logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.30 2018고정1066
도시및주거환경정비법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the cooperative of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Housing Redevelopment Project Association that has the Seongbuk-gu B as a project site.

Where an owner of land, etc. requests the perusal or reproduction of documents concerning the implementation of an improvement project, such as the register of cooperative members, and related data, the chairperson of the promotion committee shall not also peruse or copy data containing false information.

Nevertheless, on March 25, 2016, the Defendant received a request for perusal and reproduction of the register of union members from D who prepared for the temporary union members to dismiss the head of the association as an agenda item. On April 12, 2016, the Defendant issued to D outputs of the register of ownership, such as the land, etc. on which 319 owners, such as the land, etc., on which 235 union members are entered, are arranged, but the name of 319 union members, are arranged, from the Seoul E building and the office located in the third floor Fyp, as the list is the list of union members.

As a result, the Defendant received a request for perusal and duplication of the list of union members and copied data containing false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Entry of the defendant in part of H in the second suspect examination protocol against the defendant;

1. Investigation report (a false list of union members shall be presumed to be the list of landowners, such as land), investigation report (the date and time of an extraordinary general meeting for dismissal of the president of an association, and the source

1. The list of union members (as of April 1, 2015), false inspection and copying of the list of union members, (D), copy of the register of union members, copy of the register of union members, application form (including inquiry of the Supreme Court case), response, Seoul Northern District Court's decision of provisional disposition on provisional disposition on the law of the branch of Seoul, submission of the complainant, list of union members on January 5, 2017, relevant data such as information disclosure application (85 No. 1) and written decision on provisional disposition on provisional disposition [1] the following circumstances recognized by evidence, i.e., the reason why D requested perusal of the list of union members.

arrow