logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.23 2018고단90
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person who has been provided with personal information from a personal information manager shall use such personal information for any purpose other than the intended purpose of provision, unless he/she obtains a separate consent from the subject of information or otherwise provided for

The Defendant, a personal information processing entity, is the Chairperson of the Organization’s Emergency Countermeasures Committee, which presents an opposing opinion on the details of redevelopment and improvement projects of the C Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Projects Association, and the Defendant’s mother is a member of the said Association.

The Defendant and E had the intent to request the information disclosure of the list, etc. of the union members to send the newsletters in which the purport of the Defendant and E is written to the union members in order to send the newsletters to the union members, which are written to the effect that the Defendant and E may cause property damage by being evaluated as low appraisal prices compared to other redevelopment improvement zones in the vicinity.

Accordingly, on May 31, 2017, the Defendant, along with E, entered “data review, identification of facts, etc.” in the column for the purpose of using data (personal information use) and requested information disclosure on the list of union members and owners of land, etc. at that time, received information on 966 members, such as the list of attached crimes (1) and sent it to the Defendant, using the name and address of the members of the above list, and the Defendant sent to 316 members, such as the list of attached crimes (2) and the list of annexed crimes (2).

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with E to receive personal information from the personal information manager, and used it for other purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E.

arrow