1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 8, 2011 to May 19, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Presumed facts

A. The status of the party is that the Plaintiff is a person who received the hair surgery from the Defendant in the Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council member (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”), and the Defendant is a doctor who operated the above Council member and performed the hair surgery to the Plaintiff.

B. On November 10, 2009, the Plaintiff, who implemented the Defendant Council member or maternity surgery, was consulted with the Defendant by attending the Defendant Council member, and was subject to a maternity surgery on two occasions. On January 8, 2010, the Plaintiff was subject to a maternity surgery that transplants approximately 4,000 hairs from the Defendant on two occasions (hereinafter “the first surgery”).

On January 8, 2011, at the Defendant Council, the Plaintiff was subject to two-lanes from the Defendant’s two-lanes of “the latter heading part of the Plaintiff, who is a public figure 1cm x 20cm x 20cm x the body of the beneficiary, transplant the body of the Plaintiff collected in this part into the second heading, who is a beneficiary, and inurning the body of the body of the heading, as above (hereinafter “the instant operation”), and the number of transplantd hairs is approximately KRW 2,500.

C. After the surgery, the Plaintiff wished to receive medical treatment in the Gunsan, which is the domicile, and did not receive medical treatment for the part of the surgery from the Defendant Council member after the surgery, and did not receive medical treatment for the part of the surgery from the medical institution located in the Gunsan after the surgery.

The plaintiff's current state first surgery, most of which were transplantd, and 5 cm on the left side side at the time of the operation of this case x 3 cm on the right side x 7 cm on the right side x 2 cm.

(ii)There is no reproduction in these reflects. [The facts of no dispute over the basis of recognition, the entries in Eul's Evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, and 6, the evidence No. 1-2, 2, 3, Eul's Evidence No. 1-2, 2, and 3, the images of Eul's Evidence No. 2, the results of each request for appraisal to the Jeonnam University Hospital in this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings,

2. The Plaintiff’s medical negligence led to the Plaintiff’s occurrence of a transplant caused by the instant surgery.