logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.18 2018고단6862
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From April 12, 2018, a person operating an officetel entertainment business establishment called "H" on a lease of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan D Building E, F, and G, and Defendant B, who was employed by Defendant A from May 12, 2018 to receive KRW 2 million per month from May 12, 2018, is a woman employed by the said business establishment to receive KRW 11 to 120,000,00,000 per month, and Defendant C is a woman employed by the said business establishment to receive KRW 11 to 20,000,000 per month.

1. On May 31, 2018, Defendants A and B conspiredd to advertise sexual traffic business establishments under the above D Building G, and arranged to receive 1.60,000 won of sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who found the place, and let them to do sexual intercourse with the above C, which is a female sexual traffic.

In addition, from April 2018 to May 31, 2018, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic at least 10-12 times a day by having an unspecified number of male customers receive sexual traffic payment of KRW 15-170,000 per day from May 12, 2018 to May 31, 2018, and from May 31, 2018, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic at least 10-12 times a day by allowing them to sexual intercourse with C, I, etc.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant C, around May 31, 2018, committed sexual intercourse against unspecified male customers in the same manner as the above D Building E, F, and G, from April 2018 to May 31, 2018, including the fact that the male grandchildren received sexual intercourses in return for sexual intercourses amounting to KRW 1.60,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants by the prosecution

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against J, I, or K;

1. Application of the statutes on site photographs, hosting photographs and short-term use contracts;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A and B: Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts.

arrow