The punishment of the accused shall be eight months by imprisonment.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) used, without compensation, a private document preparation and event held in his/her possession, a house located in the ASEAN (hereinafter “the instant house”); and (b) was leased under the condition that he/she leaves the house without any objection if he/she receives a request for withdrawal from the owner; and (c) there was no delegation from B for the approval of the sub-lease of the instant house or for the preparation of a lease agreement.

On October 29, 2014, the Defendant, at the office of “E” in the location of the site for a real estate lease agreement, entered “F,” “B,” “B,” and “A” in the column for the location of the site for the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant located in Asan-si, Asan-si, and exercised one copy of the real estate lease agreement, which is a private document on rights and obligations, by gathering the qualification of the agent of B for the purpose of exercising the Defendant’s seal on the side, and then, issued the said fact to F as if the real estate lease agreement drawn up at the seat was duly formed.

2. On October 10, 2014, the fraud Defendant did not obtain the consent to the sub-lease of this case from B as described in paragraph 1, and did not have any relationship with B, and even if he received money from the victim F as the deposit money, the victim did not have the intent or ability to have the victim live normally in this case, and the victim did not have the intent or ability to have the victim live normally in this case. The victim’s “the owner is a child within his house, who works in Seoul East Branch Support, with the Macro, having been working in Seoul East Branch Support, and having been working in the house because the Macro is an string, and is managing the house of this case with the delegation of Maca. Accordingly, it would be possible to enter into a contract with the former tenant, 25 million won out of the deposit deposit for the former tenant, 200,000 won, and the remainder shall be deposited directly by the former tenant G.