beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on April 201, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2017, and is currently under probation period.
[Basic Facts] The Defendant, who is engaged in the business of concluding a real estate lease contract with an authorized broker who operates the "C Authorized Broker Office" located in the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and was delegated by the victim D, who is an elementary school, to conclude a real estate monthly lease contract for the "Housing located in the Busan Dong-gu E", which is owned by the victim of the victim. The Defendant, on its own initiative, received the lease deposit from the lessee at his own discretion and used it for personal purposes.
The Defendant was established on February 2, 2009 and the crime of forging a private document and conducting the said investigation document, but the statute of limitations has expired on February 1, 2016, and the above official brokerage office was delegated with the authority to enter into a lease contract with a monthly deposit of KRW 400,000,000,000 from the above D. In fact, although the Defendant was delegated with the authority to enter into a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 50,000,000,000, the Defendant did not have been delegated with the authority to enter into a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 50,000,000,000 in the column of the guarantee contract for the real estate lease of the above house, the Defendant entered “E” in the lessor column, “D”, and “F” in the lessee column, and then entered “D
D’s seal was affixed.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one Chapter of a real estate lease agreement in the name of D, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations without authority, and issued a forged real estate lease agreement to lessee F who is aware of the forgery on the same day and exercised it as if it was duly formed.
In addition, on the same day, the defendant entered into a lease contract with the lessee F with the above house as the lease deposit amount of KRW 50 million.