A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 201, the Defendant: (a) leased No. C 101, located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to operate a mobile phone agency from the owner of the building; and (b) decided on September 2012, that the fact that the mobile phone agency was in excess of the aforementioned mobile phone agency to take over the mobile phone agency around September 2012 was not delegated by the owner of the building; (c) instead of being delegated by the owner of the building to enter into a lease agreement with E in the name of D.

1. On September 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would be allowed to lease the above 101 unit from the building owner D” in Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City 101 and that “The said 101 unit shall be leased from the building owner D.”

However, in fact, although the Defendant did not have been entrusted with the authority to conclude a lease contract with regard to the above 101, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 20,000 won from the damaged person to the Defendant’s used account as a deposit for lease, and acquired 5,000 won in total by remittance from the 30,000 won on the 24th of the same month.

2. On September 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in entering into a lease agreement with Bupyeong-gu, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon; (b) and (c) E around September 24, 2012; and (c) in the indication of the real estate in the real estate column for the site for a lease contract by using a pen without authority to exercise the right to exercise the lease agreement with the pen;

B. C 101; 8; 8; 100 million won; 100 million won as a deposit; 2; 3.0 million won as a down payment (temporary payment); 4.00; 2.00 million won as a down payment; 12 months from the date of ordering the lessee’s property; and 3.0 million won in the lessor’s column; and 4.0 percent of the lease contract under the above name, which is a private document for rights and obligations, signed and sealed the seal of the above D, which was possessed under the name of the lessor in advance, and used it by issuing one copy of the forged lease contract to the above E, who is aware of the forgery in the name.

(i) the evidence;