logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.01.10 2019고단1354
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 1354"

1. Around June 21, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) (hereinafter referred to as the “Road”) and the Defendant driven a DNA cruise car without a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol by at least 0.230% from the front of the petition-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungcheongbuk-si to C, about approximately 500 to the front of C, 00 square meters away from the National Road Management Act.

2. On June 7, 2019, the Defendant issued an official document unlawful uttering: (a) around 21:50, when driving a drinking or non-driving license on the road in front of the petition-gu, Chungcheongbuk-si; (b) caused a traffic accident; and (c) requested the police officer E to present an identification card; (d) the Defendant presented the Defendant’s F driver’s license issued by the Commissioner of the Chungcheongnam-do Police Agency and followed the Defendant’s act as if he were one’s own.

Accordingly, the defendant denied his driver's license for F in the name of the commissioner of the Chungcheong Police Agency, who is an official document.

3. On June 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 21:55, at the places indicated in paragraph (2) at around 21:5, the Defendant: (b) carried out as if he was F; (c) signed the electronic document in the driver column of the notification of the results of drinking driving control that the police officer prepared and presented in the F name through the PDA device; and (d) sent the said electronic document to the police officer via the police network.

As a result, the Defendant, without authority, forged the F electronic records pertaining to fact certification in the F name of the police officer with the intent to obstruct the performance of duties by the police officer, and exercised the electronic records as if they were duly formed.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (3), and at the location specified in paragraph (3), and the police officer G included F’s name in the item column of the driver’s name in the situation statement report prepared by the police officer G, and then presented his signature to the police officer above.

Accordingly, with the aim of exercising authority, the Defendant forges a document in F on the proof of fact, and the completion of the document is authentic.

arrow