logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.10.15 2015고정1277
대기환경보전법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the B Co., Ltd. in Si interesting City, and the defendant B Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for textile, salt processing, etc.

1. Violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act;

(a) Any person who intends to install emission facilities generating specified hazardous air pollutants of Defendant A shall obtain permission from the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority from February 2004 to May 19, 2013, installed three dimensionals from among the textile product manufacturing facilities (use 173 cubic meters x 209 cubic meters x 209 cubic meters metres) which are air pollutant-emitting facilities, which are air pollutant-emitting facilities, which are air pollutant-emitting facilities discharged by diloromertans, specified hazardous air pollutants in the above workplace.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. 1

A, the representative of the defendant, at the time and place specified in the Paragraph A, shall have the first priority in connection with the defendant's business.

As described in the subsection, the act of violation was committed.

2. Violation of the Water Quality and Ecosystem Conservation Act;

(a) A person who intends to install a discharge facility of a defendant shall report it to the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without reporting to the competent authority, installed and operated echemical test facilities (area 124.7 square meters) which are wastewater discharge facilities in the above place of business from December 1996 to April 13, 2015.

B. Defendant B Co., Ltd. 2

A, the representative of the defendant, at the time and place stated in the paragraph, shall be the second paragraph with respect to the defendant's business.

As described in the subsection, the act of violation was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of each detection, each written confirmation of violation, a business registration certificate, an investigation report (Attachment to specified air harmful substances), an investigation report (Attachment to air pollutant emitting facilities), a request for an investigation by an establishment violating the Water Quality Conservation Act, and an investigation report (specific reporting on the timing of using smoke emitting DNA), respectively;

1. Application of each relevant video statute to each relevant photograph;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A:

arrow