logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019. 05. 24. 선고 2018누5131 판결
당좌대출이자율을 시가로 선택하는 경우 이후 2개 사업연도도 마찬가지로 당좌대출이자율을 시가로 적용하여야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daegu District Court-2018-Gu Partnership-22113 ( November 16, 2018)

Title

If the interest rate on the current loan is selected as the market price, the interest rate on the current loan shall be applied to the market price as well as the two business years thereafter.

Summary

Where a corporation selects the interest rate on overdraft at the market price pursuant to Article 89 (3) 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act, it shall apply the interest rate on overdraft at the market price for the business year of its choice and the next two business years.

Related statutes

Article 89(3)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Corporate Tax Act

Cases

2018Nu5131 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff and appellant

AAA Industrial Company

Defendant, Appellant

d) The Director of the Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Daegu District Court Decision 2018Guhap22113 Decided November 16, 2018

Conclusion of Pleadings

oly 2019.19

Imposition of Judgment

.05.24

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's imposition of corporate tax of KRW 6,679,520 for the business year of 2014 and corporate tax of KRW 9,010,80 for the business year of 2015 against the plaintiff on September 1, 2017 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

This court's reasoning is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except to change "related Acts and subordinate statutes of the first instance judgment" into "attached Acts and subordinate statutes of this judgment". Thus, this court's reasoning is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow