logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.04.25 2018구단77305
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From April 1, 1985 to May 31, 1991, the Plaintiff served in the mountain division of B stock companies, from October 4, 1991 to December 24, 191, from May 20, 192 to January 31, 201, the Plaintiff performed the work of collecting coal in C, while collecting coal, etc. from D during the period from May 2, 1992 to January 31, 201, from E to February 15, 2012, the work of driving the tea from E to the day from July 20, 201 to the day from July 20, 201, and the work of operating the tea from F stock companies to July 20, 2016 to the day from July 20, 2016 to the day from May 12, 2017.

B. After the Plaintiff’s work as above, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “satisfym satfym satfym satfym satfym sat, satfym satfym satfym satfym sat, satym sat, and satch satym sats on the side of the left and right side,” and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant. The Defendant recognized that “satisfym satfym satfym satfym satfym sat, right side sats at the right side satch,” and approved medical care for occupational diseases.

C. On October 23, 2018, the Plaintiff received an additional diagnosis of the escape certificate of a conical signboard between the 3-4-5,000 of the 3-4, the 3-4, the 5-6-7, and the 5-7, and applied for the approval of the additional injury and disease to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”). On November 9, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition to refuse the Plaintiff’s application for additional injury and disease on the ground that “the instant additional injury and disease have no causal link with the Plaintiff’s work” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 9, 11, and 12 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a attitude that imposes unreasonable force on bluri and fluri, such as digging, blacker installation, and blacker installation, in coal mines from 1985 to 2017.

arrow