The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The determination is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant has no record of exceeding the same criminal history and fine; (b) the number of times of sale and arrangement; (c) the Defendant has no acquisition of the consideration for arrangement; and (d) the fact that he/she is a voice reaction of phiphonephones as a result of an appraisal of urphones and an appraisal of urphones; and (c) the distribution of phiphones by selling and arranging the phiphones by means of sale and arrangement; and (d) the number of phiphones

Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for and frequency of the commission of the crime, method of the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and the circumstance after the suspension of execution, which are difficult to observe the protection, appears to be more serious and living; and (b) the sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.