The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, cannot be deemed unfair, considering the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, and the fact that the victim actively cooperates in the investigation of the person related to the phiphones; (b) the fact that the benefits acquired by the crime of this case are deemed not to exist; (c) the fact that the act of this case again led to the crime of this case during the suspension of the execution period due to the same crime; and (d) the fact that

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.