A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 4, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act: (a) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.086% from the long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term long-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term

At the same time, the yellow light was a three-distance intersection with on-and-off signal devices, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely proceed with an intersection while exercising due care for other traffic, such as checking the right and the right of the front side, and checking whether there is no other access vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim's G (18 years old) who was entering the direction of Sinpopopopopopopopopopopopopoposi in the direction of Sinpoposi (19 years old) and was driving in the direction of Sinpoposiposi (19 years old). The Defendant received the front portion of the said passenger vehicle as the front part of the said cargo vehicle, and caused the above victim's injury such as cerebral sloak, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and caused the victim's f (18 years old) who was driving the said vehicle to suffer from the injury such as the left sloakum sloak, etc. requiring approximately six weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, damaged the victim's (18 years old) by 70,79,970 won of repair costs, such as the exchange of the front kackpole car owned by the said passenger vehicle.

2. Around 19:30 on October 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven the cargo vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.086% at the time of the so-called So-called So-called So-called So-called “N-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D. D.