beta
Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
Ⅰ. The Defendant, while serving in the female juvenile community of the B police station from February 14, 2007 to July 24, 2008, was in charge of the control of and investigation into illegal sexual traffic drinking places in the B police station, and worked in D from February 25, 2010 to July 11, 201. From March 2010 to July 2, 201, the Defendant was in charge of the instant investigation, such as violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as sexual traffic mediation, etc. (trade mediation, etc.) with regard to G called “F”, as well as the victim of the investigation department and the victim of violent violence in D, from March 2, 2010 to July 2, 2010.
As above, the defendant was working in the female juvenile community of B police station as above, and when the police officer of Dong fee who worked in the above female juvenile community for the same period as the defendant knew that H had regularly received money and valuables from 10 business establishments to take charge of illegal sexual traffic under the pretext of prevention of control, provision of enforcement information, crackdown, etc., and management of the above business establishments, he did not receive part of money and valuables from H under the pretext of control, crackdown, etc. for the above illegal business establishments managed by H.
Accordingly, on August 2007, the Defendant received KRW 3 million in cash from H under the pretext of preventing crackdowns on illegal businesses within the jurisdiction of B police station female youth department offices in B police station located in I or taking measures such as reducing related investigation cases.
Defendant, as above, received KRW 3 million from H from around July 2008, from that time to July 2008, 36 million in total in cash from H in the same place as in a crime list, from around 12 times in the same manner as in the crime list.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to his duties as a public official.
Ⅱ The Defendant and his defense counsel did not receive a bribe from H.
The defendant is a member of the investigation team centered on the J around 2010.