logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.12.12 2016고합61
공직선거법위반등
Text

Defendant

The defendant shall be sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor, 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor, and 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, implemented April 13, 2016, the 20th National Assembly member general election election district, is the spouse of S, who was sent to the candidate of the R Party, Defendant B is the accountant in charge of the above S candidate, Defendant D is the election campaign worker, Defendant E is the chief of the election campaign liaison office, Defendant F is the chief of the U election campaign liaison office, Defendant C, Defendant G and V are volunteers.

1. Unless Defendant A and Defendant B provide actual expenses and other benefits under the Public Official Election Act, they cannot provide money, goods, and other benefits in connection with the election campaign regardless of the pretext, such as allowances, actual expenses, and other compensation for volunteer service. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendants conspired to provide 1.3 million won for each volunteer at the election campaign office of the S candidate in Chungcheongbuk-W around January 28, 2016, and the Defendants paid 1.3 million won for each volunteer to X, Y, etc. from around that time to April 19, 2016, and the date of receipt No. 1. 8 of the attached Table 1 of the List of Crimes in the indictment is stated as “No. 18, 2016.” However, the accurate date of receipt appears to be “No. 19, 2016.”

Until now, in collusion with the attached list 1, money and valuables were provided in relation to election campaign by providing the campaign workers with food expenses other than actual expenses under the Public Official Election Act or providing volunteers with wages.

2. Defendant A and Defendant C’s violation of the Public Official Election Act cannot provide money, valuables, or other benefits in connection with election campaign regardless of the pretext, such as allowances, actual expenses, and other compensation for volunteer service, except where actual expenses, etc. are provided pursuant to the Public Official Election Act. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendants conspired to do so on January 14, 2016, the Defendants paid KRW 2.5 million to the person in charge of accounting at the election campaign office of the above S candidate as remuneration or actual expenses, and around that time, the Defendants paid KRW 2.5 million as remuneration or actual expenses.

arrow