The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel that the defendant recognized the error of sentencing (unfair sentencing), the defendant committed the crime of this case by contingently, and deposited 6 million won for the victim, etc., the sentence of the court below that sentenced 8 months of imprisonment is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s crime of this case is not good in light of the snow and face of the victim E (25 years of age) who is a ward in the workplace where the Defendant had raised a usual dissatisfaction on the elevator and followed the Defendant to board the elevator, and then taken dangerous articles (1m in total length), and booms the victim’s bridge, arms, etc. into several times, booms the victim’s face, 10 times in drinking, knee, raising the victim’s face with knee and knee, etc., the crime of inflicting an injury necessary for treatment between about eight weeks is not good, and the victim was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, and the victim was punished by the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc., and thus, the court below’s argument that the above punishment is too unreasonable is not reasonable in light of all the following circumstances.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.