logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.04.03 2018나2842
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

The reasoning behind this part of the court’s reasoning is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Of the contents of paragraphs 1(c) and 1(2) above, “in the event that an airline ticket necessary for departure from Vietnam, or the procedures, etc. necessary for the issuance of accommodation reservations, and for the declaration of marriage in Vietnam and in Korea, are determined as an agent for the preparation and submission of domestic documents, including the issuance of airline tickets necessary for departure from Vietnam, or for the reservation of accommodation and marriage for departure from Vietnam, on behalf of a foreign country for the issuance of marriage reports and visa, and for the preparation and submission of domestic documents.” Paragraph 1(d)(1) as follows.

“1) On May 20, 2015, the Defendant entered into a transfer agreement with Vietnam on May 20, 2015, and on May 21, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 5,500,000 to Vietnam as follows: (a) a transfer agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”) to the effect that the payment of KRW 7,00,000,000 to Korea is made for the expenses for new introduction, wedding, issuance of new copies, and vicarious execution of preparation and submission of foreign marriage documents, etc. (hereinafter “instant transfer agreement”); and (b) a transfer agreement between the first instance judgment and the Plaintiff, which paid KRW 1,50,000,00 to Vietnam after the marriage ceremony was completed.”

The gist of the plaintiff's assertion on the claim of the principal lawsuit "a dispute without any dispute, Gap's 1 through 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 through 13, 19, 20, 28, Eul's 1, Eul's 4-1, 2, Eul's 5, 6, and 12, and the result of the first instance court's verification, the whole purport of the pleadings," is that the plaintiff completed all the works necessary for marriage between the defendant and C according to the contract of travel and document agency of this case, and the defendant unilaterally married.

arrow