logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.25 2019고정680
사문서위조등
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) performed a vehicle rental contract at the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of

2. The Defendant forged a private document stating “E”, “F”, and “G” in the resident registration number column on the paper of the vehicle rental contract, which was kept there at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, using an authorized color pen.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a vehicle rental contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

3. The Defendant: (a) leased a H-5 car to C’s employees D who knew of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph (1); and (b) delivered the forged vehicle rental contract as if it was a document duly formed.

4. Around 08:30 on April 10, 2018, the Defendant driven a HK5-car without obtaining a vehicle license from a section of about 7 km from the 6 km-ro public bus terminal in Yeongju-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu to the 263 Cheongju-ro road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A copy of a driver's license, the register of driver's licenses, and vehicle rental contract;

1. Before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and prosecution records;

1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Article 230 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (a point of uttering of improper official document), Article 231 of the Criminal Act (a point of use for private document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (a point of use for private document), Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow