1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 279,606,400, Plaintiff B’s KRW 70,000,000, and each said money, from July 25, 2018.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff A, as examined below, was convicted of violating the antipublic law as a person who was convicted of violating the antipublic law, passed the 8th higher public notice department in 1957, passed the 8th higher public notice department in 1957, served as a public prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice and the Seoul District Public Prosecutor in 1960, retired from the public prosecutor in 1965, and started the lawyer.

Plaintiff

B is the wife of the plaintiff A, who is in a legal marital relationship.

B. Investigation and trial process with respect to Plaintiff A (1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter “instant completion”) around July 20, 1972, the completion of the investigation and trial process with respect to Plaintiff A (hereinafter “C”).

(2) On January 21, 1975, the investigator of the Central Information Department requested that the plaintiff who had returned home at least 22:40 on January 21, 1975, "on the other hand, it is necessary to conduct a short-term inspection, so that the plaintiff A was connected to the underground room of the Southern Central Information Department of the Republic of South and North Busan, and the plaintiff was released by the plaintiff on January 23, 1975, requesting that the plaintiff voluntarily recover the "C" book for the "F" published by the plaintiff on January 11:00 after completion of the investigation into the plaintiff A.

3) The Prosecution’s charge stating that Plaintiff A reported Plaintiff A as a member of the patriotic Republic of Korea, and was killed in a non-legal trial due to the social order and the abuse of power and law, such as the fact that Plaintiff A’s entire accusation, i.e., social order and national defense, was erroneous in South Korea (hereinafter “instant charges”). Meanwhile, the Prosecutor’s Office took advantage of the following facts: (a) the expression through the instant handbook to assist in the propaganda activities of North Korea; and (b) engaged in the activities of her members by encouraging and praiseing anti-government organizations (hereinafter “

(4) On September 11, 1975, the Seoul District Criminal Court was detained in the judgment of 75 order3459, and the above court convicted the Plaintiff A of the facts charged, and sentenced the Plaintiff A of imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and suspension of qualifications for one year and six months. 4) The Plaintiff was sentenced to the judgment of the first instance court as above.