1. The defendant shall pay the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to each of the amounts stated in the attached Form 3. The compensation statement "the amount" and each of the above amounts.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 12, 1973, Plaintiffs A, and C entered the Department of Political Diplomatic Affairs of Tuniversity around 1973, and Plaintiff F entered the Department of Tuniversity on or around March 1973. Meanwhile, on or around March 17, 1972, U.S., a Korean national of the Republic of Korea, received education in Korean language for one year at a research institute, and entered the Department of T University private history on or around March 1973, and the Plaintiff A, F, andO was known through class and class. 2) On October 12, 1975, the Central Information Division investigator conducted an investigation into the form of voluntary movement without a warrant of U.S., and conducted an investigation into the violation of the National Security Act in the form of a espionage, the National Security Act, and the violation of the National Security Act, and conducted an investigation into the Plaintiffs’ violation of the National Security Act in the form of voluntary execution on October 17, 1975.

3) Plaintiff A, F, andO were forced to make confessions from the investigators in the Central Information Department without any contact with the outside during the process, and the above plaintiffs made several statements to the effect that they led to the confessions of their suspicions by preparing the suspect interrogation records, statements, and rebuttals. 4) Plaintiff A, F, andO were indicted for a violation of anti-public law (Seoul Criminal District Court 75Dahap987, Apr. 30, 1976); the Seoul Criminal Court sentenced Plaintiff A to imprisonment for three years and six years, suspension of qualifications and three years, suspension of qualifications, and suspension of qualifications for the Plaintiff F, and two years, respectively, on April 30, 1976, the Seoul Criminal Court convicted Plaintiff A of all the facts charged of the violation of anti-espionage prevention against the Plaintiff, violation of the National Security Act, violation of the anti-public law, violation of the National Security Act against Plaintiff F, violation of the anti-public law, and violation of the anti-public law against PlaintiffO.

(hereinafter referred to as "the subject case of this case"). Accordingly, although the above plaintiffs appealed to Seoul High Court 76No117, the appellate court rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on August 26, 1976.