logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고정676
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging a private document;

A. On July 30, 2013, the Defendant purchased a computer at the 4-lane 17, 5,000 store in Pyeongtaek-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Seoul, and applied for a Samsung Credit Card in the name of Samsung Electronic City, and around August 9, 2013, upon receipt of the head of the above Samsung Card from the customers’ office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant entered the said Samsung Card as “B” in the customer request form issued by Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and the subsequent signature column as “C” respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of customer request in B, which is a private document on proof of facts.

B. Around September 5, 2013, the Defendant entered “B” in the customer column of the application for the SK Card in the name of E agency located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, as “B” and entered the same in the subsequent signature column as “C”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the SK Card application form in the name of B, a private document related to rights and obligations.

(c)

On October 2, 2013, at a place where a location is unknown, the Defendant filed an application for a modern card in the name of Hyundai Card Company B, and around October 5, 2013, the Defendant received the said modern card from Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and entered “B” in the column of the written consent for membership subscription issued by the Hyundai Card Company and the written consent for personal information inquiry into “C”, respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the application to join the Hyundai Card M in B, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. Exercising the relevant investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1(a) and at the place, issued and exercised a written request from the customer in the name of forged B, as described in paragraph 1(a), as if the written request from the customer was duly formed.

B. The Defendant.

arrow