1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The part resulting from the participation in the increased costs of appeal is assessed against the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in the part of "1. Recognizing the facts of recognition". Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

After the second 10th 10th 10th 10th 2th 2th 10th 2th 2th 201, “the possibility of early repayment after August 17, 2012,” was added to “the possibility of early repayment after August 17, 2010,” and “the QCP 11 was registered with the Korea Securities Depository on August 18, 2009 pursuant to Article 4 of the Registration of Bonds and Debentures Act (Evidence 9).”

(b) by inserting “issuance” following the 14th 14th 14th e.g., the first instance judgment.

(c) Three (3) of the judgment of the first instance court, “B” shall be deemed to be “the Defendant shall at the request of B.”

Under the 3th judgment of the first instance court, the 3.1 billion won out of the total amount of 5.1 billion won (amount of 4.1 billion won in principal) (amount of 5.1 billion won in principal) is 3.1 billion won in principal (=interest of 4.8 billion won in principal). The 4.1 billion won in principal (= interest of 2.8 billion won in principal) is 3.1 billion won in principal (= interest of 2.8 billion won in principal).”

(e) 2 below the fourth decision of the first instance court is moving “the Plaintiff” to “the Defendant.”

F. Following the fifth five-party decision of the first instance court, the following is added: “In accordance with Article 6(1) of the above Agreement, the principal claim of KRW 2.8 billion and the interest claim of KRW 300 million were transferred to Etha in accordance with the bonds with the preemptive right of this case.”

(g) 6th six (5) of the first instance judgment shall add the following:

Pursuant to Articles 6(2) and 7(1) of the above Agreement, the remaining principal claim of KRW 2 billion among the bonds with the preemptive rights of this case and the pledge rights on the shares of this case remaining to be owned by QCP 11 without transferring it to Ethi.e., QCP 11. Pursuant to Article 7(5), the claim for transfer price of KRW 3.4 billion against QCP 11 was converted to the loan claim of KRW 3.4 billion, and the transfer content bears the joint and several liability obligations for the above loan obligations.

(h) 5th instance judgment.