The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

The costs of appeal are incidental costs.

1. The plaintiff's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance and the defendant's grounds for incidental appeal are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance except for the following matters to be determined additionally. Even if the evidence submitted by this court is examined as evidence submitted by the court of first instance, the recognition of facts in the court of

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance or the addition of the judgment on the plaintiff's assertion, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

【B”, the actual operator of the Defendant’s “B”, the representative director of the Defendant’s 2nd 8th e.g., “B” Co., Ltd. C (hereinafter “C”) of the 8-9th e.g., “B”.

2. “A” Defendant “A” in both 10, 16, 3-2, 7-2, 8-1, 8-2, 8-2.

Defendant B with the trade name of “H” of the 3rd one, shall be used as “H”, and all “Defendants” of the 3rd two parallels, three parallels, six parallels, and 17 parallels shall be used as “H”.

The 3rd parallel "200,000,000 won" shall be adjusted to "20,000,000 won", and the 4th parallel "235,000,000 won" shall be adjusted to "543,487,076 won".

7 Evidence A No. 3 of the 18th 18th am "A" with evidence 4 and 8 of the 8th am "A" with evidence 6 of the 4th am "A, 9th am. 5th am."

6 The following shall be added to 5 pages:

Although the Defendant asserts that all the prices of goods have been paid after November 8, 2014, the above assertion by the Defendant is unacceptable as it is based on only the details of transactions calculated from November 8, 2014 to June 30, 2016, on the premise that the previous claim for the prices of goods has expired by prescription as follows.

【4) Determination of the Plaintiff’s assertion is based on the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if so, KRW 680,000.