Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a relationship in which the father C of a victimized child B (the age of 17 and the grade of intellectual disability 2) live together.

In spite of the fact that no one commits any physical abuse against a child that may injure the child’s body or injure the physical health and development of the body, the defendant, at around 13:00 on May 5, 2019, at the parking lot of the Egypted “Egypted” located in Do in Yasan-si, the defendant, after getting off his/her body and getting out of his/her body that he/she reported on the ground that he/she does not intend to have his/her body at his/her place of residence, and doing any act in his/her surrounding his/her place of residence, and continuously led the child entering the above church to wear his/her clothes according to the victim entering the above church, and at the time he/she took part of his/her body, such as the victimized child, one time as a tree stick attached to the said church and coffee store.

As a result, the defendant committed physical abuse that may injure the body or injure the health and development of the victimized child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the ctv image to the closure photographs and the victim victim B-victim photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and subparagraph 2 of Article 71 (1) and subparagraph 3 of Article 17 of the Child Welfare Act (Selection of Fines) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on July 18, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for violating the Child Welfare Act (child abuse) in the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on July 18, 2018, and did not know even though he was under the suspension of execution, and repeated the instant crime against the same victimized child in the second degree of intellectual disability without any awareness of any particular crime, and thus, ought to be strictly punished.

However, the defendant reflects his depth on the crime, the contents and degree of the crime have not been much much weighted, and he does not live together any longer with the child victim's reference.