Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the vice president of E Co., Ltd., and Defendant B is the representative of the above company.

Defendants were required to submit materials to verify whether or not they had the company’s administrative power in the process of tendering for a project for the selection of a project for the creation of a F apartment rooftop waterproof Co., Ltd. around September 2017, and the Defendants were previously issued and kept.

On November 11, 2016, a public document was conspired to be submitted by forging and submitting an official document with the content that E is not subject to an administrative disposition, using a written reply to a request for confirmation of administrative disposition (E) under the name of the Ansan market.

Defendant

B, on September 1, 2017, upon the conspiracy to commit the crime as above, he/she may sleep the documents using a slickner to the effect that “E is not subject to an administrative disposition during the period from November 11, 2013 to November 11, 2016” without authority for the purpose of exercising an administrative disposition at the above E office, and form a file after the submission of the documents to request confirmation of the administrative disposition (E) under the name of the Ansan Market on November 11, 2016, and form the file using the slick market program to change the contents of the relevant file to the effect that E does not have received an administrative disposition from September 1, 2014 to September 1, 2017, and then changed the date of preparation of the document to September 1, 2017, and then made a reply to the request for administrative disposition [E] to verify the facts (E) by the method of sending out the file in the name of the Jeju Market.”

Then, Defendant B is the same year.

9. On September 1, 2017, the Plaintiff submitted to G the apartment management office G a reply to the request for confirmation of administrative disposition (E) under the name of the Simsan-si, which was forged on September 1, 2017, without knowledge that the document was forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the original official document altered;

1. Articles 225 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.