logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고단6638
공문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant C of 10 months, Defendant D and E, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

K Co., Ltd. is a company engaged in the business of managing multi-family housing, etc. upon entrustment. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C are the managers who have overall control over the affairs in the private consignment management sector of the above company. Defendant E and Defendant D are the employees who have been in charge of the business of preparing documents in the private consignment management sector of the above company.

However, around November 201, on the ground that the foregoing company violated the provision on the selection announcement of a business entity under the Housing Act, the company was subject to the imposition of an administrative fine of KRW 3 million from the Y-gu Office on the ground that it was in violation of the provision on the selection announcement of a business entity under the Housing Act, and the “written reply on a request for confirmation of the fact of administrative disposition” to be submitted at the time of bidding was anticipated to be disadvantaged in the bidding process, and the Defendants were willing to submit the said written reply in a bidding document to the effect

1. Joint principal offenders committed by Defendant A, B, and D on June 12, 2012

A. On June 12, 2012, the Defendants forged official document documents at the office of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu in Busan, the office of the head of the Gu, and Defendant A and Defendant B instructed Defendant D to keep up the contents of the “in response to a request for confirmation of administrative disposition” under the name of the head of the Gu under the jurisdiction of the head of the Gu under the jurisdiction of the head of the Gu under the jurisdiction of the head of the Gu under the jurisdiction of the head of the Gu. Defendant D can can the said reply by using the computer, and then printed it again into the “content” column of the can’s image within the last five years (from November 1 to December 11, 207 as of the date of application for confirmation as of the date of application for confirmation).

As a result, the Defendants forged ‘the response to the request for confirmation of facts' under the name of the head of the Gu, which is an official document, for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendants of the forged official document uttering in collusion, and around June 12, 2012, “Korea-Japan apartment” located in the Busan Metropolitan City Shipping Daegu East-dong.

arrow