1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of the following items of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The part of "the sum of KRW 492,624,380" in the 6th 7 and 8th 7th 7 of the first instance judgment is paid as follows.

【A total of KRW 503,124,380 paid to the Plaintiff (as seen below, the Defendant: (a) led to the first instance court’s confession that the construction price paid to the Plaintiff was KRW 492,624,380; and (b) was revoked at the first instance court.

) Each of the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment “492,624,380 won” and each of the 503,124,380 won shall be considered “503,124,380 won.”

Each "Witness" of not more than 17 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be read as "Witness of the first instance court".

Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance court shall not be subject to Part 14 of the Decision. The following shall be added:

【On the other hand, the Defendant was at issue in the course of moving his waste disposal facilities to the captain-general G, and the Defendant was ordered to suspend the construction of B district Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, the original contractor (hereinafter “instant partnership”).

(2) The Plaintiff concluded the instant construction contract and the instant amendment contract temporarily with the Plaintiff, with concerns that the construction would not be completed within the agreed period, and concluded the said contract and subsequently agreed to convert the contract into the direct operation of the Defendant if the Defendant would be able to perform waste transport treatment. The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s waste transport and disposal work (hereinafter “instant transport and disposal work”).

Before commencement, the Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant directly performed the instant transport management pursuant to the present agreement prior to the possibility of the instant transport management by obtaining permission of change.

According to each of the statements 20-4 to 11, the defendant shall keep the waste disposal facilities, 1.