logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.14 2014나2015987
토지보상금증액
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The basic facts;

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the allegations by the parties are as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

6 pages 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referred to as "whether possible".

The 6th page 20 or less "Plaintiffs" shall be respectively dismissed as "Plaintiffs".

The land indicated in the “number” column of the attached Table 2 of attached Table 2 (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) shall be cut into “Seongnam-gu, Jungnam-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”)” and the “each land of this case” shall be cut into “the instant land”.

In Forms 7 through 8, the "amount stated in the "amount of compensation" column for the attached Table 2 shall be "726,268,570 won".

Section 10.1. The following shall be added to each other:

【3) Even if there is a change in the specific use area of a snow station, the land in this case is changed to an exclusive residential area or a Class-I general residential area, so an appraisal should be conducted on the premise of such change

A person shall be appointed.

3. Determination

A. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the special agreement of this case are as follows: “(a) of the first instance judgment No. 10, 5(a)”; “each land” of the first instance judgment No. 11 and “each land” of the first instance judgment No. 11 are as stated in the first instance judgment No. 10, 5, 13 and 2, except where “the land of this case” are as stated in the first instance judgment No. 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the appraisal method are as follows: “(a)” to “(1)”;(b) to “(15)” to “(b)” to “(2)”; and (c) to “13(4) to 16(11) of the reasoning of the first instance judgment.” Thus, this part of the appraisal method is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

C. In the case of the plaintiff, the plaintiff.

arrow