1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

(1) Defendant (Appointed Party) (Appointed Party from Plaintiff 606,538.)

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as that of the first instance court's decision, except for the dismissal or addition as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, the reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part that is dismissed or added is "Defendant B (Appointed Party)" in Section 6 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 3 (hereinafter "Defendant B") as "Defendant B".

Part III of the decision of the court of first instance is "C and D" in Part III as "Defendant (Appointed Party) (hereinafter "Defendant C") and the Appointed D."

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, not more than 8, "Defendant Network E" shall be collectively referred to as "the network E".

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance court, the “Appointed F” of not more than 10 shall be deemed to be “Defendant F”, and “Appointed G” shall be deemed to be “Defendant G” collectively.

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, not more than 15, "Appointed C" shall be referred to as "Defendant C" collectively.

On the 5th judgment of the first instance court, the term "this court" in the 14th judgment shall be read as "the first instance court".

On September 16, 2015, the first instance court's 6th decision " September 16, 2016" in the 18th sentence shall be " September 16, 2015".

In Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Determination on Defendant B's assertion" in Part 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "B. Determination on the Defendants' assertion".

The following shall be added to the 8th sentence of the first instance court, the 15th sentence:

(4) On June 30, 2011, the Mayor of Seoul Metropolitan Government changed the zone to be rearranged into 58,376.2 square meters in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, and designated it as a rearrangement zone. Accordingly, the project zone was changed to the extent that it would lose its identity with the previous project zone.

However, since the head of Mapo-gu Office's approval of composition of the promotion committee of this case on August 7, 2006 is related to the previous improvement planned zone, it shall be deemed that the formation approval disposition of the promotion committee of this case is invalidated due to the modification of the improvement zone, and therefore, the composition approval disposition of the promotion committee of this case is valid.