1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' arguments asserts to the following purport in the trial, including the arguments in the first instance trial.

In other words, when the defendant hospital implemented only the inducement by excessive administration of the gymtoma, a gymtoma, with respect to the deceased who does not fall under the gymnasium adaptation, it neglected to observe the progress and observation of the gymnasium, which is a private person of the deceased, due to neglecting the gymnasium measurement, observation of the gymnasium condition, etc., the defendant hospital added to the whole gymnasium of the deceased's private person, and rejected the deceased's request for the gymnasium operation in the process, and prevented the deceased from undergoing the gymnasium operation in a timely manner, while continuing to implement the gymnasium operation, the defendant hospital suspended the movement of the deceased who refused the movement of the gymnasium in the process of supplying the gymnasium, and continued to perform the gymnasium operation without neglecting the operation's symptoms in the process of the operation.

In addition, the defendant hospital neglected to secure human resources who can immediately respond to the above emergency situation, i.e., the above emergency situation, and also committed an error of delaying cardiopulmonary resuscitation against the deceased and king king against the plaintiff C.

Ultimately, due to the above mistake, the Defendant hospital caused the death of the deceased and caused the fetus (Plaintiff C) to suffer from herthic hystrophism.

In addition, the defendant hospital had a assistant nurse who is unable to perform medical practice in the course of carrying out only the work against the deceased, and the defendant hospital allowed the deceased and the plaintiff A, who is her husband, to perform medical practice at night.