logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.08 2015나11692
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs (appointed parties), the designated parties, and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in the part of “1. Basic Facts” judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. When a doctor of the relevant legal doctrine performs medical acts such as diagnosis, treatment, etc., he/she has the duty of care to take the best measures required to prevent risks depending on the patient’s specific symptoms or circumstances, given the patient’s specific symptoms or circumstances. Such duty of care is based on the level of medical practice performed in the clinical medical field, such as medical institutions, at the time of the medical practice. The level of medical care refers to the so-called medical awareness generally known and recognized at the time of the medical practice, and thus, should be determined at a normative level in light of the medical environment and

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Da45146 Decided November 10, 201, etc.). B.

In light of the above legal principles, according to the above recognition of responsibility, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital did not conduct the inspection by an appropriate method at the time of conducting a double clum examination on the deceased on May 24, 2011.

In addition, in a situation where the deceased is aged and has already seen the training opinion from the sectional sericultural blood examination, there is a view of destruction of the studal studal studal studal studal studal studal string on the performance book of the workplace-S upper studal studal studal studal studal studal strings on the deceased. In addition, in a case where there is a narrow view of the studal studal studal studal studal stals

Nevertheless, the Defendant Hospital issued a normal judgment to the Deceased immediately, and had the Deceased receive early diagnosis of the death’s cancer.

arrow