1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 14,470,79 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from January 11, 2015 to October 25, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 10, 2015, at around 03:55, the Defendants were tightly sealed and tightly sealed on the grounds that the Defendants’ daily behaviors face with the Plaintiff’s daily behaviors, in front of the mutual restaurant called “H” located in Ulsan-gu G.

B. During the aforementioned dispute, Defendant B brought an injury to the Plaintiff, such as the luminous bones and the felite flachising of her face, due to an empty flachising who had been placed in the said place at the time, and caused approximately four weeks of treatment to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant injury”). C.

Defendant B was sentenced to a criminal trial on the criminal facts that inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff as Ulsan District Court 2015Kadan1675, and was sentenced to one and half years of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution on February 16, 2016, and the above judgment became final and conclusive.

The remaining Defendants, except Defendant B, were investigated into the facts of the Plaintiff’s joint assault crime, and were determined to suspend indictment on July 29, 2015, taking into account the fact that the Defendants, while under the influence of each other, committed a crime by contingency.

[Based on the recognition] Defendant F: The judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act) is without dispute against the remaining Defendants; the entry in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and 15 (including those with a serial number) and the overall purport of the pleading (the Defendants are deemed to have discharged the Plaintiff’s claim according to the purport of the entire pleading, even though they were absent on the date for pleading without submitting a reply

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding that liability for damages occurred, since the Plaintiff sustained the injury of this case due to the Defendants’ assault, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the tort.

B. 1) The Plaintiff seeking reimbursement of KRW 3,145,100 for future treatment costs, but the Plaintiff’s statement in the evidence No. 13 alone is sufficient to support the future treatment costs.