logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.08.28 2014나9790
손해배상(산)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendants shall be paid in excess of the amount ordered under the following subparagraphs to the Plaintiff A.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court's explanation as to the existence of the basic facts and the defendants' liability for damages are "1. Liability for damages" among the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance.

(a) The grounds for liability are the same as the entry of the part of the "liability", thereby citing it in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Scope of damages.

A. Plaintiff A’s assertion that Plaintiff A claimed medical expenses, lost earnings, and future treatment expenses (1) was incurred in each injury of the following: (a) the Plaintiff’s assertion that Plaintiff A suffered from the instant accident: (i) Gyeong-in infection, (ii) cerebral fever, (iii) cerebralinum, (iv) scalinine, (v) scalinium, (v) scalinium and salt on either side, and (vi) 5-6 scalinium escape from the side of the scalinical signboard; and (iii) the injury of the forecast signboard escape certificate No. 5-6 (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

(2) On August 17, 2012, the Defendant spent 2,416,830 won for the treatment of the injury of this case to the Ansan-in Hospital. In addition, the rate of loss of labor capacity due to the injury of this case reaches 11.5% (3 years), the daily income is calculated as 7,624,259 won. In order to treat the injury of this case, KRW 14,70,440 is necessary for the treatment of the injury of this case. Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for KRW 24,81,529, which is the sum of the treatment expenses, the daily income, and the future treatment expenses. However, the Plaintiff alleged that the causal link between the accident of this case and the injury of this case was caused by the accident of this case, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s physical injury and the injury of this case’s hospital of Busan-in Hospital on July 4, 2013.

Rather, each of the above evidence, Gap evidence 2-3, Eul evidence 5, 12, Eul evidence 6-1 to 4, Eul evidence 17-1 to 6, and Eul evidence 17-1 to 6 can be seen as follows.

arrow