logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.04 2015고단5351
공문서위조등
Text

[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the head of "F Child Care Center" on the second floor of the Seocho-gu Busan apartment management Dong, and the defendant B is the person who has worked as the member of the above F Child Care Center, and the defendants are women.

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal acts or illegal means should not receive subsidies or use subsidies.

Nevertheless, from March 2014 to October 201 of the same year, the Defendants filed for KRW 4,342,340 for basic childcare fees, KRW 1,050,000 for working environment improvement expenses, and KRW 6,092,340 for welfare allowances and KRW 700,000 for registration in the childcare center as if Defendant B did not take charge of the above childcare center's dead-end and reflectr teachers, even though Defendant B did not take charge of the above childcare center's dead-endr teachers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive 6,092,340 won of subsidies by illegal means.

2. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On September 2014, the Defendant, at the above F Child Care Center office, prepared and posted the phrase “20 days” on July 11, 2014, using a computer on the date of issuance of the sex offense inquiry answer issued by the head of the Busan City Police Station around July 11, 2014 by the special instructor G of the above Child Care Center and H, and copied it.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged a sexual crime history inquiry report in the name of the head of Busan Police Station, which is an official document.

B. On November 13, 2014, the Defendant, at the above F Child Care Center, was demanded to present an inquiry reply for the sex offense history of G and H at the Busan Metropolitan City Office from I affiliated with the Busan Metropolitan City Office, and the Defendant presented it to I, who knew of the forgery, as if he were a genuine issuance.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's legal statement (this provision shall apply only to paragraph (2) of the crime);

1. The witness I and J's respective statements and the witness K's some statements;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. The written accusation and accompanying documents;

arrow