logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.18 2014고단1550
영유아보육법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants were married on August 13, 1998 and continued to have a de facto marital relationship at Defendant B’s mother’s domicile after the divorce on May 16, 2006.

Defendant

A is a person in charge of accounting-related affairs, such as receiving subsidies from the above childcare center, receiving subsidies from the above childcare center, and receiving subsidies from the above childcare center, and Defendant B is a person in charge of overall affairs concerning the operation of the child care center as the president of the above childcare center.

1. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants - The State or local government that violates the Infant Care Act shall not receive any subsidy or use any subsidy by fraud or other improper means in obtaining full or partial subsidy for expenses incurred in infant care services, such as the establishment of child care centers and personnel expenses for infant care teachers;

A. The Defendants conspired with the Defendants to commit the crime of N false registration and connected to the childcare integrated administrative system using a computer at “M childcare center”, a childcare facility located in K at the Jeonju-si, around October 1, 2012, and then N entered the said childcare center as an infant care teacher from October 2012 to October 4, 2013, from that time, N entered into the childcare center as a total of 26 times from around October 2012 to around October 4, 2013, as shown in attached Table 1 of the List of Offenses Act, and from around August 2013 to May 2013, 2013, N applied for subsidies.

However, there was no fact that only until August 31, 2012, N had been working in the child-care center and died on the ground of childbirth and continued to work for the above period.

The Defendants, as seen above, received subsidies from N on October 25, 2012 for personnel expenses of N in 359,298, by means of inputting false information into the childcare integrated administrative system, starting from that time.

arrow