Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the punishment against the defendant B for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A operated a 'F Child Care Center' in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, as the president, and the defendant B served as a child care teacher in the above 'F Child Care Center' as the female student of the above 'A'.

A child care teacher of a child care center shall be assigned one person for seven or more infants who are at least two years of age and under three years of age, and a child care teacher in charge of the Ban shall be eligible for a subsidy for personnel expenses for infant care teachers and basic infant care fees for infants in child care centers if the former working hours are at least eight hours, and no person shall receive a subsidy or use a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, even though Defendant B did not have a teacher who works for at least eight hours in the former from “G”, which is an infant half of the above child care center and under the age of 2 to 3, the Defendants were willing to receive subsidies for the personnel expenses of infant care teachers and the basic infant care fees for infant care teachers who are paid every month by falsely inputting Defendant B in the integrated infant care system.

As above, the Defendants conspired to enter Defendant B into the Unified Infant Care Teachers System in a false manner on April 5, 2013, and receive subsidies from a public official in charge of Yangcheon-gu Office who believed such false facts to be genuine, by means of improving the working environment of teachers around April 5, 2013, 260,000 won under the pretext of improving treatment and welfare expenses around March 25, 2013, as well as 30,000 won under the pretext of expenses for improving treatment and welfare expenses for infants, and 1,830,000 won under the pretext of basic infant care expenses around March 12, 2013, and from that time received KRW 1,830,000 under the pretext of basic infant care expenses around March 12, 2013, from that time, from February 7, 2017, by receiving the subsidies by fraud of KRW 105,79,160 as shown in the attached crime list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made against H, I, J, K, L, or M;

1. Relevant precedents and related precedents.