A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2, 2017, a joint defendant C (hereinafter “C”) separated from the Defendant interfering with his/her duties, deemed that he/she performed drinking in the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim E in North Kim Jong-si on December 15:40, 2017, with two persons, while drinking alcohol together with two persons, and that he/she was a vision, and dispute between him/her and the horses, and that he/she interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance within the restaurant for about 20 minutes, such as the shouldering of the disease on the floor on the table.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C, interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On December 2, 2017, at around 16:00, the Defendant and C, upon receiving a report from the Defendant and C at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1 at the above paragraph 1, were subject to the removal from H and slope I, the circumstances belonging to the G District in the Kim Jong-gu Police Station G District, which called “I, I, I, I, I and I, I want to take the back of I, I, I, and I, I tried to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of interference with the performance of official duties.

Therefore, in order to prevent the arrest of the defendant by I, I divided I's hand with a handsaw, and even though the above H tried to remove the defendant C from the defendant I, I tried to leave H's chest with his left hand and continuously arrest the defendant.

Accordingly, I take off C out of the restaurant, and C, at that place, "Death and discarded" to I.

”라고 말하고, 발로 I의 정강이를 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the above I and H, who are police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to E, H and I;

1. Investigation report (related to photographing photographs of damaged parts), photographs;

1. Investigation report (to attach CCTV images recorded in the form of a crime interfering with the performance of special official duties), CCTV.