Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 70,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On February 5, 2018, at around 22:32, the Defendant: (a) demanded G, the head of the said main shop, to “F” while drinking alcohol with the victim E, which was operated by Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to “F,” but was refused, left the glass of the drinking branch to the floor, thereby cutting off the glass; (b) on the ground that the victim was trying to take a main point after the dispatch of the police officer, and did not come to the mind, the Defendant intending to take a bath to the victim, and had the victim take a desire to flab, and flabing the body with the victim, and had the customers drinking alcohol at the place, such as having the victim and the body fightd for 40 minutes.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

B. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above main points, received a report of the above E- 112, the owner of the business, and was dispatched to the site from the Inspector I belonging to the Gangseo-gu Police Station H District, Gangnam-gu Police Station, who called to the site, as seen above, and received a check from the Defendant, “Chewing spackers,” and packers.

§ 400,000,000

I am blished with her fingers while she was blished.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. Defendant B committed assault, at the same time and at the same place, that Defendant B committed an act of assault, such as: (a) the defect in which he attempted to take a lock in order to arrest a flagrant offender A due to a suspicion of interference with the performance of his official duties; (b) the attacked the I’s arms; and (c) the I’s body sealed him.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the investigation body (a police officer's camping ground verification);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;